• Cells Don’t Always Divide the Way You Were Taught in School

    A groundbreaking study from The University of Manchester has overturned a 100-year-old assumption about how cells divide. Traditionally, students learn that a parent cell rounds into a sphere before splitting into two identical daughter cells. But real-time imaging of living zebrafish embryos has now shown that this isn’t always the case.

    Researchers discovered that in many natural scenarios, dividing cells do not become round. Instead, the original shape of the cell before division determines how the cell will split. Wider, shorter cells tend to round and divide symmetrically. In contrast, longer, thinner cells don’t round up and undergo asymmetric division—producing daughter cells that differ in both size and function.

    This process, once thought to be limited to rare stem cell behavior, may be widespread across developing tissues, including blood vessels. Importantly, it could help explain how complex tissues form—and how diseases like cancer spread. Researchers also used a precise laser micropatterning technique to manipulate cell shape in human cells, confirming that shape alone influences how cells divide.

    This discovery may change how biology is taught and opens new possibilities in regenerative medicine by allowing scientists to guide cell function simply by adjusting cell shape.

    Follow Science Sphere for regular scientific updates!

    Research Paper
    Holly E. Lovegrove et al, "Interphase cell morphology defines the mode, symmetry, and outcome of mitosis," Science (2025).
    Cells Don’t Always Divide the Way You Were Taught in School A groundbreaking study from The University of Manchester has overturned a 100-year-old assumption about how cells divide. Traditionally, students learn that a parent cell rounds into a sphere before splitting into two identical daughter cells. But real-time imaging of living zebrafish embryos has now shown that this isn’t always the case. Researchers discovered that in many natural scenarios, dividing cells do not become round. Instead, the original shape of the cell before division determines how the cell will split. Wider, shorter cells tend to round and divide symmetrically. In contrast, longer, thinner cells don’t round up and undergo asymmetric division—producing daughter cells that differ in both size and function. This process, once thought to be limited to rare stem cell behavior, may be widespread across developing tissues, including blood vessels. Importantly, it could help explain how complex tissues form—and how diseases like cancer spread. Researchers also used a precise laser micropatterning technique to manipulate cell shape in human cells, confirming that shape alone influences how cells divide. This discovery may change how biology is taught and opens new possibilities in regenerative medicine by allowing scientists to guide cell function simply by adjusting cell shape. Follow Science Sphere for regular scientific updates! đŸ§Ģ Research Paper 📄 Holly E. Lovegrove et al, "Interphase cell morphology defines the mode, symmetry, and outcome of mitosis," Science (2025).
    0 Comments 0 Shares 293 Views
  • The Perseids Are Coming — August 12–13!

    Get ready, stargazers! On these nights, the Perseid meteor shower will peak, filling the sky with bright, fast-moving meteors — sometimes up to 100 an hour at the height of the show. These flashes of light are tiny bits of comet Swift-Tuttle burning up in Earth’s atmosphere at incredible speeds.

    At its peak, you might spot up to 100 meteors every hour, each one a glowing streak born from ancient comet dust racing through our atmosphere at breathtaking speeds. No telescope required — just find a dark, open spot, get comfy, and let your eyes adjust to the night.

    Want the best view? Escape the city lights, bring a blanket, and give yourself 20–30 minutes in the dark to truly take in the show. Whether you see a few or a sky full, the Perseids are proof that the cosmos still loves to surprise us.
    The Perseids Are Coming — August 12–13! 🌠 Get ready, stargazers! On these nights, the Perseid meteor shower will peak, filling the sky with bright, fast-moving meteors — sometimes up to 100 an hour at the height of the show. These flashes of light are tiny bits of comet Swift-Tuttle burning up in Earth’s atmosphere at incredible speeds. At its peak, you might spot up to 100 meteors every hour, each one a glowing streak born from ancient comet dust racing through our atmosphere at breathtaking speeds. No telescope required — just find a dark, open spot, get comfy, and let your eyes adjust to the night. Want the best view? Escape the city lights, bring a blanket, and give yourself 20–30 minutes in the dark to truly take in the show. Whether you see a few or a sky full, the Perseids are proof that the cosmos still loves to surprise us.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 254 Views
  • Movie Title: Mowgli: The Legend of the Jungle
    Cast: Christian Bale, Cate Blanchett, Benedict Cumberbatch, Naomie Harris, Andy Serkis, Matthew Rhys, Freida Pinto
    Director: Andy Serkis
    Producers: Steve Kloves, Jonathan Cavendish, David Barron
    Language: English
    đŸŽŦ Movie Title: Mowgli: The Legend of the Jungle 🎭 Cast: Christian Bale, Cate Blanchett, Benedict Cumberbatch, Naomie Harris, Andy Serkis, Matthew Rhys, Freida Pinto đŸŽŦ Director: Andy Serkis đŸŽĨ Producers: Steve Kloves, Jonathan Cavendish, David Barron đŸ—Ŗī¸ Language: English
    0 Comments 0 Shares 224 Views
  • New Tamil movie Bangla dubbing ' Love Story | āϞāĻžāĻ­ āĻ¸ā§āĻŸā§‹āϰāĻŋ ' - starring Naga Chaitanya and Sai Pallavi in lead role
    New Tamil movie Bangla dubbing ' Love Story | āϞāĻžāĻ­ āĻ¸ā§āĻŸā§‹āϰāĻŋ ' - starring Naga Chaitanya and Sai Pallavi in lead role
    0 Comments 0 Shares 62 Views
  • Did you know Earth is just one tiny dot in a universe that stretches far beyond what we can see? In our galaxy alone there are an estimated 3.2 trillion planets. Yes you read that right. Trillions of worlds spinning around billions of stars just like our Sun. Speaking of stars our Sun is only one of around 200 billion stars shining across the Milky Way.

    And that is just our galaxy. The Milky Way is only one of about 2 trillion galaxies in the observable universe. That means what we can see and measure may be only a small part of what is really out there. Every one of those galaxies holds its own stars its own planets and possibly even its own version of life. The scale of it all is beyond anything our minds can truly grasp.

    This incredible knowledge comes from decades of astronomical research using powerful space telescopes like Hubble James Webb and Gaia. With each new mission we learn more about our place in the universe and the mind-blowing number of planets and galaxies surrounding us. It changes how we see Earth not as the center of everything but as one planet among trillions floating in an ocean of stars.

    Thinking about these numbers can make you feel small but also incredibly lucky. Our little blue planet may be one of many but it is the only one we know that supports life. That makes it rare precious and worth protecting.

    So next time you look up at the night sky remember you are part of something massive mysterious and beautiful.

    #SpaceFacts #UniverseScale #MilkyWayGalaxy #TrillionPlanets #CosmicPerspective #AstronomyLovers
    Did you know Earth is just one tiny dot in a universe that stretches far beyond what we can see? In our galaxy alone there are an estimated 3.2 trillion planets. Yes you read that right. Trillions of worlds spinning around billions of stars just like our Sun. Speaking of stars our Sun is only one of around 200 billion stars shining across the Milky Way. And that is just our galaxy. The Milky Way is only one of about 2 trillion galaxies in the observable universe. That means what we can see and measure may be only a small part of what is really out there. Every one of those galaxies holds its own stars its own planets and possibly even its own version of life. The scale of it all is beyond anything our minds can truly grasp. This incredible knowledge comes from decades of astronomical research using powerful space telescopes like Hubble James Webb and Gaia. With each new mission we learn more about our place in the universe and the mind-blowing number of planets and galaxies surrounding us. It changes how we see Earth not as the center of everything but as one planet among trillions floating in an ocean of stars. Thinking about these numbers can make you feel small but also incredibly lucky. Our little blue planet may be one of many but it is the only one we know that supports life. That makes it rare precious and worth protecting. So next time you look up at the night sky remember you are part of something massive mysterious and beautiful. #SpaceFacts #UniverseScale #MilkyWayGalaxy #TrillionPlanets #CosmicPerspective #AstronomyLovers
    0 Comments 0 Shares 399 Views
  • On the night of September 7-8, nearly 7 billion people — about 85% of the world population — will witness a total lunar eclipse!

    A full Blood SuperMoon.

    As the Moon drifts into Earth’s shadow, it will gradually transform from its familiar silver glow into a deep coppery-red hue, a breathtaking display caused by sunlight filtering through the Earth's atmosphere — often called the “Blood Moon.”

    Why it’s iconic:

    Witness the entire eclipse sequence, from penumbral shading to the dramatic totality.

    The Moon’s crimson glow is unique to each eclipse, determined by atmospheric conditions on Earth.

    One of the most widely visible eclipses in history, offering skywatchers across the globe a chance to experience this cosmic marvel.

    Where and how to view:

    USA: Best viewed late in the evening on September 7 into the early hours of September 8. The eclipse will be visible across most states; those on the East Coast will see it high in the sky, while the West Coast will catch it lower on the horizon during moonrise or moonset.

    Europe: Observers will enjoy prime viewing conditions during the early morning hours of September 8. Clear skies will allow the Moon’s gradual transition into totality to be seen in its entirety.

    Pro tip: Find a dark-sky location with a clear horizon for the most dramatic view. A pair of binoculars or a small telescope will reveal even more detail as Earth’s shadow slowly sweeps across the lunar surface.

    This total lunar eclipse is a rare chance to witness the Moon’s metamorphosis with your own eyes — no special equipment required. Mark your calendar, gather loved ones, and prepare for one of nature’s most hauntingly beautiful shows!
    On the night of September 7-8, nearly 7 billion people — about 85% of the world population — will witness a total lunar eclipse! A full Blood SuperMoon. 🌕 As the Moon drifts into Earth’s shadow, it will gradually transform from its familiar silver glow into a deep coppery-red hue, a breathtaking display caused by sunlight filtering through the Earth's atmosphere — often called the “Blood Moon.” 🔭 Why it’s iconic: Witness the entire eclipse sequence, from penumbral shading to the dramatic totality. The Moon’s crimson glow is unique to each eclipse, determined by atmospheric conditions on Earth. One of the most widely visible eclipses in history, offering skywatchers across the globe a chance to experience this cosmic marvel. 🌍 Where and how to view: USA: Best viewed late in the evening on September 7 into the early hours of September 8. The eclipse will be visible across most states; those on the East Coast will see it high in the sky, while the West Coast will catch it lower on the horizon during moonrise or moonset. Europe: Observers will enjoy prime viewing conditions during the early morning hours of September 8. Clear skies will allow the Moon’s gradual transition into totality to be seen in its entirety. 📸 Pro tip: Find a dark-sky location with a clear horizon for the most dramatic view. A pair of binoculars or a small telescope will reveal even more detail as Earth’s shadow slowly sweeps across the lunar surface. đŸ—“ī¸ This total lunar eclipse is a rare chance to witness the Moon’s metamorphosis with your own eyes — no special equipment required. Mark your calendar, gather loved ones, and prepare for one of nature’s most hauntingly beautiful shows!
    0 Comments 0 Shares 170 Views
  • Forever Young-Music Travel love ft.Bugoy Dirlon
    Forever Young-Music Travel love ft.Bugoy Dirlon
    Wow
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 56 Views
  • Hamza on the loves he feels in Bangladesh

    "The first time we went over, we went back to my village, so it was really rural. It was a big part of my childhood growing up.

    “[The reception] is indescribable. The lads speak about it quite a lot, it’s surreal. I don’t think it will ever be normal, that level of it.

    "As footballers, we get a lot of attention while we’re in the UK, but it’s nothing like the reception I got out there. It’s amazing.

    "People can say it might be scary or overwhelming, but honestly, it’s so much of my heart over there. They’re all just there for positivity and to show me love, so it’s such a good feeling."

    Read Hamza's full interview, exclusively on our App
    Hamza on the loves he feels in Bangladesh 🇧🇩 đŸ’Ŧ "The first time we went over, we went back to my village, so it was really rural. It was a big part of my childhood growing up. “[The reception] is indescribable. The lads speak about it quite a lot, it’s surreal. I don’t think it will ever be normal, that level of it. "As footballers, we get a lot of attention while we’re in the UK, but it’s nothing like the reception I got out there. It’s amazing. "People can say it might be scary or overwhelming, but honestly, it’s so much of my heart over there. They’re all just there for positivity and to show me love, so it’s such a good feeling." Read Hamza's full interview, exclusively on our App 📲
    0 Comments 0 Shares 149 Views
  • In 2022, Google quietly wired Apple a mind-blowing $20 billion. There was no scandal. No lawsuit. No broken systems. Just one of the most strategic, low-key deals in the history of tech.

    And yet, most people don’t even know it happened.

    All Google wanted was one thing—to remain the default search engine on every iPhone, iPad, and MacBook around the world. That’s it. One slot. One silent placement that gave Google access to more than half the world’s mobile traffic.

    That deal, that little setting most users never even change, fuels over a third of Google’s mobile ad revenue. Because when you open Safari and search something, it’s Google that serves the result. And Apple? Well, they collect a massive cut of that cash.

    Back in 2014, this deal was just $1 billion. But as the stakes rose and iPhones spread across the globe, the price tag climbed with them. Fast forward a few years, and Google is paying Apple between $18 to $20 billion every single year. That’s not just pocket change—that’s more than the GDP of some countries.

    Behind the scenes, this partnership is so valuable that Google considers losing it a “Code Red” event. They literally have internal crisis drills in case Apple ever walks away. On the flip side, Apple makes so much from this single partnership that some say it covers nearly 20% of its operating income.

    What makes it even more fascinating is that Apple doesn’t even offer its own search engine. And despite being tech rivals in public, Apple continues to call Google the “best search engine” while raking in billions.

    When Microsoft tried to get in on the deal, offering Apple 90% of Bing ad revenue, Apple didn’t even flinch. They stayed with Google. Not because they love them. But because the deal works—and it's invisible to most users.

    This quiet alliance isn’t just lucrative—it’s also controversial. U.S. regulators have opened antitrust lawsuits over this deal, arguing that it locks out competition and gives Google unfair dominance. But while the courts argue, the checks keep clearing.

    For entrepreneurs and founders, this story holds powerful lessons.

    Google didn’t pay for ads. They paid for position.

    And that position—being the default—unlocked one of the most valuable revenue streams in modern tech. Sometimes in business, the best seat at the table is not the loudest one. It’s the one people overlook. It’s the one baked into habit.

    It also shows that traffic is the new gold. Not the app. Not the content. But the ability to direct and control where attention flows. Apple could have built their own search engine. But they didn’t need to. Letting someone else win—while getting paid billions—is a different kind of power.

    We often think business success comes from being loud, innovative, or disruptive. But sometimes, the real power lies in quiet control. In unseen agreements. In being the one who decides what happens next—not necessarily the one who builds it.

    And so, two of the biggest tech giants, who seem like enemies on the surface, are actually tied together in one of the smartest, most profitable deals ever made.

    It’s a silent alliance. A strategic position. And a masterclass in how power really works in the modern world.

    Let it sink in: Google pays Apple billions… just to stay in your search bar.

    That’s the level of positioning every entrepreneur should aim for.

    Not just to be seen—but to be default.

    It does appear there is a pawn in this game. Can you guess who it is?

    #GoogleAppleDeal
    #TechStrategy
    #AntitrustRealities
    #DefaultPosition
    #TrafficMonopoly
    #DigitalPowerPlays
    #BusinessLessons
    #StartupWisdom
    #PlatformThinking
    #EntrepreneurMindset
    Kachi Ogbonna
    In 2022, Google quietly wired Apple a mind-blowing $20 billion. There was no scandal. No lawsuit. No broken systems. Just one of the most strategic, low-key deals in the history of tech. And yet, most people don’t even know it happened. All Google wanted was one thing—to remain the default search engine on every iPhone, iPad, and MacBook around the world. That’s it. One slot. One silent placement that gave Google access to more than half the world’s mobile traffic. That deal, that little setting most users never even change, fuels over a third of Google’s mobile ad revenue. Because when you open Safari and search something, it’s Google that serves the result. And Apple? Well, they collect a massive cut of that cash. Back in 2014, this deal was just $1 billion. But as the stakes rose and iPhones spread across the globe, the price tag climbed with them. Fast forward a few years, and Google is paying Apple between $18 to $20 billion every single year. That’s not just pocket change—that’s more than the GDP of some countries. Behind the scenes, this partnership is so valuable that Google considers losing it a “Code Red” event. They literally have internal crisis drills in case Apple ever walks away. On the flip side, Apple makes so much from this single partnership that some say it covers nearly 20% of its operating income. What makes it even more fascinating is that Apple doesn’t even offer its own search engine. And despite being tech rivals in public, Apple continues to call Google the “best search engine” while raking in billions. When Microsoft tried to get in on the deal, offering Apple 90% of Bing ad revenue, Apple didn’t even flinch. They stayed with Google. Not because they love them. But because the deal works—and it's invisible to most users. This quiet alliance isn’t just lucrative—it’s also controversial. U.S. regulators have opened antitrust lawsuits over this deal, arguing that it locks out competition and gives Google unfair dominance. But while the courts argue, the checks keep clearing. For entrepreneurs and founders, this story holds powerful lessons. Google didn’t pay for ads. They paid for position. And that position—being the default—unlocked one of the most valuable revenue streams in modern tech. Sometimes in business, the best seat at the table is not the loudest one. It’s the one people overlook. It’s the one baked into habit. It also shows that traffic is the new gold. Not the app. Not the content. But the ability to direct and control where attention flows. Apple could have built their own search engine. But they didn’t need to. Letting someone else win—while getting paid billions—is a different kind of power. We often think business success comes from being loud, innovative, or disruptive. But sometimes, the real power lies in quiet control. In unseen agreements. In being the one who decides what happens next—not necessarily the one who builds it. And so, two of the biggest tech giants, who seem like enemies on the surface, are actually tied together in one of the smartest, most profitable deals ever made. It’s a silent alliance. A strategic position. And a masterclass in how power really works in the modern world. Let it sink in: Google pays Apple billions… just to stay in your search bar. That’s the level of positioning every entrepreneur should aim for. Not just to be seen—but to be default. It does appear there is a pawn in this game. Can you guess who it is? #GoogleAppleDeal #TechStrategy #AntitrustRealities #DefaultPosition #TrafficMonopoly #DigitalPowerPlays #BusinessLessons #StartupWisdom #PlatformThinking #EntrepreneurMindset Kachi Ogbonna
    0 Comments 0 Shares 497 Views
  • In 1998, Yahoo made the most expensive mistake in corporate history.

    Two kids begged them to buy their tiny website for $1m.

    But Yahoo’s CEO called it "a waste of time".

    11 years later, those kids wiped Yahoo off the internet.

    Here’s the shocking story of Yahoo's downfall.

    1994, Yahoo started as a college project I
    A website built to help people find information online.

    By 1996, it became the largest online platform at a $33.8M valuation.

    They had the users, the hype, and the cash.
    But cracks were forming…

    Then in 1998, two Stanford students, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, built a revolutionary search engine.

    Their algorithm made Yahoo’s search look ancient.

    Unlike Yahoo’s directory-style listings, where human editors manually organized websites,

    These guys built something different.

    Their secret sauce? PageRank.

    Instead of just matching keywords, their algorithm ranked websites based on how many other sites linked to them, like academic citations.

    The more links a site had, especially from other credible pages, the higher it ranked.

    The result? Faster, smarter, more relevant search results.

    They named it Google.

    And when they offered to sell it to Yahoo for just $1 million, Yahoo laughed.

    “Search isn’t our focus,” they said.

    They had no idea that tiny algorithm would become their executioner.

    They turned it down, saying it wasn’t “worth their time.”

    But instead of killing the idea completely, Yahoo made the worst business decision in tech history

    They plugged Google search into Yahoo’s homepage.

    Their thinking? "Let users still come to Yahoo, but let Google handle the search behind the scenes."

    Smart in the short term.
    A catastrophe in the long run.

    Because here’s what happened:

    People LOVED Google

    It was fast, simple, and accurate, everything Yahoo search wasn’t.

    So each time someone used Yahoo, they were unknowingly falling in love with Google.

    Yahoo gave Google the exposure it needed to explode.

    And explode it did.

    Suddenly, Yahoo panicked.

    They came crawling back and offered to buy Google for $3 billion.

    But Google said, “Nah. We’re worth $5B now.”

    Yahoo laughed… and walked away again.

    Another trillion-dollar blunder, served cold with ego and regret.

    Still in denial, Yahoo doubled down.
    They decided to build their own walled ecosystem.

    They launched platforms for news, sports, shopping, and finance.

    They didn’t want to send users out, they wanted to keep them in.
    All in the name of ad revenue.

    Meanwhile, the internet exploded.
    Websites multiplied like wildfire.
    And Yahoo’s outdated, slow search system couldn’t keep up.

    So users did what users always do when something sucks:

    They left.

    They went to Google, where the search was smarter, cleaner, lightning-fast.
    No clutter. No noise. Just results.

    And then… Google played its masterstroke:

    AdWords.

    A genius idea: Businesses could bid to show up on Google search but only pay if someone clicks.

    Ads that felt natural. Relevant. Contextual.

    Every single search became a money machine.
    Google was printing cash.
    Advertisers loved it. Users didn’t mind it.

    Google didn’t just win search.
    They turned it into a business empire.

    While Yahoo? They were busy shopping.

    Buy every Tech. Company to remain relevant

    $5.7B for Broadcast com.
    $1.1B for Tumblr.
    Billions poured into acquisitions, most of them flops.

    They weren’t innovating.
    They were trying to buy relevance.

    But Google kept building: Gmail. Maps. Android. YouTube. Chrome.

    Every product was a hit.
    Every move, strategic. User-first.

    By 2009, Yahoo had had enough.

    They gave up on search completely.
    Handed it over to Microsoft.

    Let Bing take the wheel.

    Yes, Yahoo literally gave its core product to a competitor.

    That was the beginning of the end.

    In 2016, Yahoo was sold to Verizon for just $4.48 billion.
    A sad fall from a $125B peak.

    Once a titan. Now a tech ghost.

    So what really went wrong?

    Google had vision.

    They took bold bets. Focused on people. Played the long game.

    Yahoo was scattered.
    Short-sighted. Chasing quick wins and shiny distractions.

    In the end, Google didn’t just outperform Yahoo.
    They buried them.

    Because sometimes, playing it safe is the most dangerous move of all.

    Yahoo had the chance to buy Google twice.

    But they said no.

    And it cost them everything.

    So what can we learn from Yahoo’s downfall?

    Plenty.

    Here are the cold, hard lessons:

    - Never ignore innovation because it’s “too small.”
    That tiny idea you call a “waste of time” today could be your biggest threat tomorrow.

    - If you don't serve your users, someone else will.
    Yahoo chased ads. Google chased users. Guess who won?

    - Don’t fear disruption, own it.
    Yahoo was too comfortable. Too focused on preserving the old.
    Google rewrote the rules and owned the future.

    - Exposure is power.
    Yahoo thought they were “helping” Google by showing their results.
    They were unknowingly building their rival's brand on their own homepage.

    - You can’t outspend strategy.
    Yahoo thought buying companies was the answer.
    But real dominance is built, not bought.

    - Simplicity scales.
    While Yahoo was cluttered with portals and ads, Google kept it clean.
    Sometimes the simplest product wins.

    - Vision > Vanity.
    Google had a long-term vision.
    Yahoo wanted to look big fast.
    The difference? One is still around. The other is a tech relic.

    In business, it’s not about who starts first.
    It’s about who adapts, who listens, and who leads.

    Yahoo had the throne.
    But they gave it away twice.

    So remember this:

    The most expensive mistake in business isn’t doing the wrong thing.
    It’s ignoring the right one.

    #google
    #Yahoo
    #TechStories
    Tech Stories
    Ifeanyi Christopher
    In 1998, Yahoo made the most expensive mistake in corporate history. Two kids begged them to buy their tiny website for $1m. But Yahoo’s CEO called it "a waste of time". 11 years later, those kids wiped Yahoo off the internet. Here’s the shocking story of Yahoo's downfall. 1994, Yahoo started as a college project I A website built to help people find information online. By 1996, it became the largest online platform at a $33.8M valuation. They had the users, the hype, and the cash. But cracks were forming… Then in 1998, two Stanford students, Larry Page and Sergey Brin, built a revolutionary search engine. Their algorithm made Yahoo’s search look ancient. Unlike Yahoo’s directory-style listings, where human editors manually organized websites, These guys built something different. Their secret sauce? PageRank. Instead of just matching keywords, their algorithm ranked websites based on how many other sites linked to them, like academic citations. The more links a site had, especially from other credible pages, the higher it ranked. The result? Faster, smarter, more relevant search results. They named it Google. And when they offered to sell it to Yahoo for just $1 million, Yahoo laughed. “Search isn’t our focus,” they said. They had no idea that tiny algorithm would become their executioner. They turned it down, saying it wasn’t “worth their time.” But instead of killing the idea completely, Yahoo made the worst business decision in tech history They plugged Google search into Yahoo’s homepage. Their thinking? "Let users still come to Yahoo, but let Google handle the search behind the scenes." Smart in the short term. A catastrophe in the long run. Because here’s what happened: People LOVED Google It was fast, simple, and accurate, everything Yahoo search wasn’t. So each time someone used Yahoo, they were unknowingly falling in love with Google. Yahoo gave Google the exposure it needed to explode. And explode it did. Suddenly, Yahoo panicked. They came crawling back and offered to buy Google for $3 billion. But Google said, “Nah. We’re worth $5B now.” Yahoo laughed… and walked away again. Another trillion-dollar blunder, served cold with ego and regret. Still in denial, Yahoo doubled down. They decided to build their own walled ecosystem. They launched platforms for news, sports, shopping, and finance. They didn’t want to send users out, they wanted to keep them in. All in the name of ad revenue. Meanwhile, the internet exploded. Websites multiplied like wildfire. And Yahoo’s outdated, slow search system couldn’t keep up. So users did what users always do when something sucks: They left. They went to Google, where the search was smarter, cleaner, lightning-fast. No clutter. No noise. Just results. And then… Google played its masterstroke: AdWords. A genius idea: Businesses could bid to show up on Google search but only pay if someone clicks. Ads that felt natural. Relevant. Contextual. Every single search became a money machine. Google was printing cash. Advertisers loved it. Users didn’t mind it. Google didn’t just win search. They turned it into a business empire. While Yahoo? They were busy shopping. Buy every Tech. Company to remain relevant $5.7B for Broadcast com. $1.1B for Tumblr. Billions poured into acquisitions, most of them flops. They weren’t innovating. They were trying to buy relevance. But Google kept building: Gmail. Maps. Android. YouTube. Chrome. Every product was a hit. Every move, strategic. User-first. By 2009, Yahoo had had enough. They gave up on search completely. Handed it over to Microsoft. Let Bing take the wheel. Yes, Yahoo literally gave its core product to a competitor. That was the beginning of the end. In 2016, Yahoo was sold to Verizon for just $4.48 billion. A sad fall from a $125B peak. Once a titan. Now a tech ghost. So what really went wrong? Google had vision. They took bold bets. Focused on people. Played the long game. Yahoo was scattered. Short-sighted. Chasing quick wins and shiny distractions. In the end, Google didn’t just outperform Yahoo. They buried them. Because sometimes, playing it safe is the most dangerous move of all. Yahoo had the chance to buy Google twice. But they said no. And it cost them everything. So what can we learn from Yahoo’s downfall? Plenty. Here are the cold, hard lessons: - Never ignore innovation because it’s “too small.” That tiny idea you call a “waste of time” today could be your biggest threat tomorrow. - If you don't serve your users, someone else will. Yahoo chased ads. Google chased users. Guess who won? - Don’t fear disruption, own it. Yahoo was too comfortable. Too focused on preserving the old. Google rewrote the rules and owned the future. - Exposure is power. Yahoo thought they were “helping” Google by showing their results. They were unknowingly building their rival's brand on their own homepage. - You can’t outspend strategy. Yahoo thought buying companies was the answer. But real dominance is built, not bought. - Simplicity scales. While Yahoo was cluttered with portals and ads, Google kept it clean. Sometimes the simplest product wins. - Vision > Vanity. Google had a long-term vision. Yahoo wanted to look big fast. The difference? One is still around. The other is a tech relic. In business, it’s not about who starts first. It’s about who adapts, who listens, and who leads. Yahoo had the throne. But they gave it away twice. So remember this: The most expensive mistake in business isn’t doing the wrong thing. It’s ignoring the right one. #google #Yahoo #TechStories Tech Stories Ifeanyi Christopher
    0 Comments 0 Shares 431 Views
  • āϖ⧁āĻŦ āϏāĻšāĻœā§‡ āχāĻ‚āϰ⧇āϜāĻŋ āĻļ⧇āĻ–āĻžāϰ āĻŸā§‡āĻ•āύāĻŋāĻ•

    â™ĒSkillful : (āĻ¸ā§āĻ•āĻŋāϞāĻĢ⧁āϞ) āĻĻāĻ•ā§āώāĨ¤
    â™ĒāϏ⧇ āĻāĻ•āϜāύ āĻĻāĻ•ā§āώ āĻĢ⧁āϟāĻŦāϞ āϖ⧇āĻ˛ā§‹ā§ŸāĻžā§œāĨ¤
    â™ĒHe is a skillful football player.

    â™ĒApart : (āĻā§āϝāĻžāĻĒāĻžāĻ°ā§āϟ) āĻĻā§‚āϰ⧇, āĻĻā§‚āϰāĻ¤ā§āĻŦ⧇āĨ¤
    â™ĒāĻ—ā§āϰāĻžāĻŽāϟāĻŋ āϤāĻŋāύ āĻŽāĻžāχāϞ āĻĻā§‚āϰ⧇āĨ¤
    â™ĒThe village is three miles apart.
    â™ĒāĻĻā§āϝāĻž āĻ­āĻŋāϞ⧇āĻœā§ āχāϜ āĻĨā§āϰāĻŋ āĻŽāĻžāχāϞāĻ¸ā§ āĻā§āϝāĻžāĻĒāĻžāĻ°ā§āϟāĨ¤

    â™ĒGive up : (āĻ—āĻŋāĻ­ āφāĻĒ) āĻ›ā§‡ā§œā§‡ āĻĻā§‡ā§ŸāĻž, āĻ¤ā§āϝāĻžāĻ— āĻ•āϰāĻžāĨ¤
    â™ĒāĻ•āĻ–āύ⧋ āφāĻļāĻž āĻ›ā§‡ā§œā§‹ āύāĻžāĨ¤
    â™ĒNever give up hope.
    â™Ēāύ⧇āĻ­āĻžāĻ°ā§ āĻ—āĻŋāĻ­ā§ āφāĻĒā§ āĻšā§‹āĻĒāĨ¤

    â™ĒTerrible : (āĻŸā§‡āϰāĻŋāĻŦāϞ) āϭ⧟āĻžāĻŦāĻšāĨ¤
    â™ĒāĻāϟāĻŋ āĻ›āĻŋāϞ āĻāĻ• āĻ­āϝāĻŧāĻžāĻŦāĻš āϏāĻĄāĻŧāĻ• āĻĻ⧁āĻ°ā§āϘāϟāύāĻžāĨ¤
    â™ĒIt was a terrible road accident.
    â™Ēāχāϟ āĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāĻœā§ āĻā§āϝāĻž āĻŸā§‡āϰāĻŋāĻŦāϞ āϰ⧋āĻĄ āĻāĻ•ā§āϏāĻŋāĻĄā§‡āĻ¨ā§āϟāĨ¤

    â™ĒServe : (āϏāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻ­) āϏ⧇āĻŦāĻž āĻ•āϰāĻžāĨ¤
    â™ĒāφāĻŽāĻŋ āϰ⧋āĻ—ā§€āĻĻ⧇āϰ āϏ⧇āĻŦāĻž āĻ•āϰāϤ⧇ āĻ­āĻžāϞāĻŦāĻžāϏāĻŋ
    â™ĒI love to serve patients.
    â™Ēāφāχ āϞāĻžāĻ­ āϟ⧁ āϏāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻ­ āĻĒā§āϝāĻžāĻļ⧇āĻ¨ā§āϟāϏāĨ¤

    â™ĒRequired: (āϰāĻŋāĻ•ā§Ÿā§āϝāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĄ) āφāĻŦāĻļā§āϝāĻ•, āĻĻāϰāĻ•āĻžāϰ⧀, āĻĒā§āĻ°ā§Ÿā§‹āϜāύāĨ¤
    â™ĒāĻāχ āĻ•āĻžāĻœā§‡āϰ āϜāĻ¨ā§āϝ āĻĻ⧁āχ āϞāĻžāĻ– āϟāĻžāĻ•āĻž āĻĒā§āĻ°ā§Ÿā§‹āϜāύāĨ¤
    â™ĒTwo lakh taka is required for this work.
    â™Ēāϟ⧁ āϞāĻžāĻ– āϟāĻžāĻ•āĻž āχāĻœā§ āϰāĻŋāĻ•ā§Ÿā§āϝāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĄ āĻĢāϰ āĻĻāĻŋāϏ āĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻ•āĨ¤

    â™ĒSolution : (āϏāϞ⧁āĻļāύ)āϏāĻŽāĻžāϧāĻžāύāĨ¤
    â™ĒāĻĒā§āϰāϤāĻŋāϟāĻŋ āϏāĻŽāĻ¸ā§āϝāĻžāϰ āχ āϏāĻŽāĻžāϧāĻžāύ āĻĨāĻžāϕ⧇āĨ¤
    â™ĒEvery problem has its solution.
    â™ĒāĻāĻ­āϰāĻŋ āĻĒā§āϰāĻŦā§āϞ⧇āĻŽ āĻšā§āϝāĻžāϜ āχāϟāϜ āϏāϞ⧁āĻļāύāĨ¤

    â™ĒIn the beginning : ( āχāύ āĻĻā§āϝāĻž āĻŦāĻŋāĻ—āĻŋāύāĻŋāĻ‚) āĻĒā§āϰāĻĨāĻŽā§‡, āĻļ⧁āϰ⧁āϤ⧇āĨ¤
    â™ĒāĻļ⧁āϰ⧁āϤ⧇, āφāĻŽāĻŋ āφāĻĒāύāĻžāϕ⧇ āĻāχ āϜāĻŋāύāĻŋāϏāϟāĻŋ āĻŦāϞāϤ⧇ āϚāĻžāχāĨ¤
    â™ĒIn the beginning, I would like to tell you this thing.
    â™Ēāχāύ āĻĻā§āϝāĻž āĻŦāĻŋāĻ—āĻŋāύāĻŋāĻ‚, āφāχ āωāĻĄ āϞāĻžāχāĻ• āϟ⧁ āĻŸā§‡āϞ āĻĻāĻŋāϏ āĻĨāĻŋāĻ‚

    â™ĒIn the end : (āχāύ āĻĻā§āϝāĻž āĻāĻ¨ā§āĻĄ) āĻ…āĻŦāĻļ⧇āώ⧇, āĻĒāϰāĻŋāĻļ⧇āώ⧇āĨ¤
    â™ĒāĻĒāϰāĻŋāĻļ⧇āώ⧇, āφāĻŽāĻŋ āφāĻĒāύāĻžāϕ⧇ āϏāĻŽāĻ¸ā§āϤ āĻ•āĻŋāϛ⧁āϰ āϜāĻ¨ā§āϝ āϧāĻ¨ā§āϝāĻŦāĻžāĻĻ āϜāĻžāύāĻžāϤ⧇ āϚāĻžāχāĨ¤
    â™ĒIn the end, I would like to thank you for everything.
    â™Ēāχāύ āĻĻā§āϝāĻž āĻāĻ¨ā§āĻĄ, āφāχ āωāĻĄ āϞāĻžāχāĻ• āϟ⧁ āĻĨā§āϝāĻžāĻ‚āĻ• āχāω āĻĢāϰ āĻāĻ­āϰāĻŋāĻĨāĻŋāĻ‚āĨ¤

    â™ĒSort out : (āϏāĻ°ā§āϟ āφāωāϟ) āϏāĻŽāĻžāϧāĻžāύ āĻ•āϰāĻžāĨ¤
    â™ĒāφāĻŽāĻžāϰ āĻāĻ–āύāχ āĻāχ āϏāĻŽāĻ¸ā§āϝāĻžāϟāĻŋ āϏāĻŽāĻžāϧāĻžāύ āĻ•āϰāĻž āĻĻāϰāĻ•āĻžāϰāĨ¤
    â™ĒI need to sort out this problem right now.
    â™Ēāφāχ āύāĻŋāĻĄ āϟ⧁ āϏāĻ°ā§āϟ āφāωāϟ āĻĻāĻŋāϏ āĻĒā§āϰāĻŦā§āϞ⧇āĻŽ āϰāĻžāχāϟ āύāĻžāωāĨ¤

    â™ĒAt once : (āĻā§āϝāĻžāĻŸā§ āĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāĻ¨ā§āϏ) āĻ…āĻŦāĻŋāϞāĻŽā§āĻŦ⧇, āϤāĻ¤ā§āĻ•ā§āώāĻŖāĻžā§ŽāĨ¤
    â™ĒāφāĻĒāύāĻŋ āĻŦāϰāĻ‚ āϤāĻžāϕ⧇ āĻāĻ•ā§āώ⧁āύāĻŋ āĻ•āϞ āĻ•āϰ⧁āύāĨ¤
    â™ĒYou would rather call him at once.
    â™Ēāχāω āωāĻĄ āϰ⧇āĻĻāĻžāϰ āĻ•āϞ āĻšāĻŋāĻŽ āĻā§āϝāĻžāĻŸā§ āĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāĻ¨ā§āϏāĨ¤

    â™ĒGo on : (āĻ—ā§‹ āĻ…āύ) āϚāĻžāϞāĻŋā§Ÿā§‡ āϝāĻžāĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāĨ¤
    â™ĒāφāĻĒāύāĻžāϰ āĻ­āĻžāϞ āĻ•āĻžāϜ āϚāĻžāϞāĻŋāϝāĻŧ⧇ āϝāĻžāύāĨ¤
    â™ĒGo on your good work.
    â™ĒāĻ—ā§‹ āĻ…āύ āχāωāϰ āϗ⧁āĻĄ āĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻ•āĨ¤

    â™ĒDue to : (āĻĄāĻŋāω āϟ⧁) āĻ•āĻžāϰāϪ⧇āĨ¤
    â™ĒāĻāϟāĻž āϤāĻžāϰ āĻ…āĻĒ⧇āĻļāĻžāĻĻāĻžāϰāĻŋāϤāĻžāϰ āĻ•āĻžāϰāϪ⧇ āϘāĻŸā§‡āĻ›āĻŋāϞāĨ¤
    â™ĒIt happened due to his unprofessionalism.

    â™ĒHuge : (āĻšāĻŋāωāϜ) āĻ…āύ⧇āĻ• āĻŦ⧜, āϚāϰāĻŽāĨ¤
    â™ĒāϐāϟāĻž āĻāĻ•āϟāĻž āϚāϰāĻŽ āϏāĻžāĻĢāĻ˛ā§āϝ āĻ›āĻŋāϞ⧋.
    â™ĒIt was a huge success.
    â™Ēāχāϟ āĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāϜ āĻā§āϝāĻž āĻšāĻŋāωāϜ āϏāĻžāĻ•āϏ⧇āϏāĨ¤

    â™ĒKeen on :(āĻ•āĻŋāύ āĻ…āύ) āφāĻ—ā§āϰāĻšā§€āĨ¤
    â™ĒāϤāĻŋāύāĻŋ āĻ—āĻžāύ⧇āϰ āĻĒā§āϰāϤāĻŋ āφāĻ—ā§āϰāĻšā§€āĨ¤
    â™ĒShe is keen on music.
    â™ĒāĻļā§€ āχāĻœā§ āϕ⧀āύ āĻ…āύ āĻŽāĻŋāωāϜāĻŋāĻ•āĨ¤

    â™ĒFond of : (āĻĢāĻ¨ā§āĻĄ āĻ…āĻĢ) āĻĒāĻ›āĻ¨ā§āĻĻ āĻ•āϰāĻž, āωāĻĒāĻ­ā§‹āĻ— āĻ•āϰāĻžāĨ¤
    â™ĒāφāĻŽāĻŋ āχāĻ‚āϰ⧇āϜāĻŋāϤ⧇ āĻ•āĻĨāĻž āĻŦāϞāϤ⧇ āĻĒāĻ›āĻ¨ā§āĻĻ āĻ•āϰāĻŋāĨ¤
    â™ĒI am fond of speaking English.
    â™Ēāφāχ āĻā§āϝāĻžāĻŽā§ āĻĢāĻ¨ā§āĻĄ āĻ…āĻŦ āĻ¸ā§āĻĒāĻŋāĻ•āĻŋāĻ‚ āχāĻ‚āϞāĻŋāĻļāĨ¤

    â™ĒEmphasize : (āĻāĻŽā§āĻĢ⧇āϏāĻžāχāϜ) āϗ⧁āϰ⧁āĻ¤ā§āĻŦ āφāϰ⧋āĻĒ āĻ•āϰāĻž, āĻœā§‹āϰ āĻĻ⧇āĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāĨ¤
    â™ĒāφāĻĒāύāĻžāϰ āύāĻŋāĻœā§‡āϰ āĻ•āĻžāĻœā§‡āϰ āωāĻĒāϰ āĻœā§‹āϰ āĻĻāĻŋāύāĨ¤
    â™ĒEmphasize your own work.
    â™ĒāĻāĻŽā§āĻĢ⧇āϏāĻžāχāϜ āχāωāϰ āĻ“āύ āĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻ•āĨ¤

    â™ĒTalk it over : ( āϟāĻ•ā§ āχāϟ āĻ“āĻ­āĻžāϰ) āφāϞ⧋āϚāύāĻž āĻ•āϰāĻžāĨ¤
    â™ĒāϚāϞ⧋ āĻāχ āĻŦāĻŋāĻˇā§Ÿā§‡ āĻ•āĻŋāϛ⧁āĻ•ā§āώāĻŖ āĻĒāϰ⧇ āφāϞ⧋āϚāύāĻž āĻ•āϰāĻŋāĨ¤
    â™ĒLet's talk it over a bit later.
    â™ĒāϞ⧇āϟāĻ¸ā§ āϟāĻ• āχāϟ āĻ“āĻ­āĻžāϰ āĻā§āϝāĻž āĻŦāĻŋāϟ āϞ⧇āϟāĻžāϰāĨ¤

    â™ĒLikely to : (āϞāĻžāχāĻ•āϞāĻŋ āϟ⧁) āϏāĻŽā§āĻ­āĻžāĻŦāύāĻž āφāϛ⧇āĨ¤
    â™ĒāĻāϟāĻž āĻšāĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāϰ āϏāĻŽā§āĻ­āĻžāĻŦāύāĻž āφāϛ⧇āĨ¤
    â™ĒIt's likely to happen.
    â™ĒāχāϟāϜ āϞāĻžāχāĻ•āϞāĻŋ āϟ⧁ āĻšā§āϝāĻžāĻĒ⧇āύāĨ¤

    â™ĒUnlikely to : ( āφāύāϞāĻžāχāĻ•āϞāĻŋ āϟ⧁) āϏāĻŽā§āĻ­āĻžāĻŦāύāĻž āύ⧇āχāĨ¤
    â™ĒāϤāĻžāϰ āφāĻžāϏāĻžāϰ āϏāĻŽā§āĻ­āĻžāĻŦāύāĻž āύ⧇āχāĨ¤
    â™ĒShe is unlikely to come.
    â™ĒāĻļā§€ āχāĻœā§ āφāύāϞāĻžāχāĻ•āϞāĻŋ āϟ⧁ āĻ•āĻžāĻŽā§āĨ¤

    â™ĒUndoubtedly : (āφāύāĻĄāĻžāωāĻŸā§‡āĻĄāϞāĻŋ) āύāĻŋāσāϏāĻ¨ā§āĻĻ⧇āĻšā§‡āĨ¤
    āύāĻŋāĻļā§āϚāĻŋāϤāĻ­āĻžāĻŦ⧇āĨ¤
    â™ĒāύāĻŋāσāϏāĻ¨ā§āĻĻ⧇āĻšā§‡ āĻ­āĻžāĻ—ā§āϝ āφāĻŽāĻžāĻĻ⧇āϰ āĻĒāĻžāĻļ⧇ āĻĨāĻžāĻ•āĻŦ⧇āĨ¤
    â™ĒUndoubtedly luck will be on our side.
    â™ĒāφāύāĻĄāĻžāωāĻŸā§‡āĻĄāϞāĻŋ āϞāĻžāĻ• āωāχāϞ āĻŦāĻŋ āĻ…āύ āφāĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāϰ āϏāĻžāχāĻĄāĨ¤

    â™ĒWake up : (āĻ“ā§Ÿā§‡āĻ• āφāĻĒ) āĻœā§‡āϗ⧇ āωāĻ āĻžāĨ¤
    â™ĒāφāĻŽāĻŋ āϖ⧁āĻŦ āϏāĻ•āĻžāϞ⧇ āϘ⧁āĻŽ āĻĨ⧇āϕ⧇ āωāĻ āĻŋāĨ¤
    â™ĒI wake up very early in the morning.

    āĻĒ⧜āĻž āĻļ⧇āώ⧇ Done āϞāĻŋāĻ–āϤ⧇ āϭ⧁āϞāĻŦ⧇āύ āύāĻžāĨ¤
    âœĒ Beef (āĻŦāĻŋāĻĢ) – āĻ—āϰ⧁āϰ āĻŽāĻžāĻ‚āϏ
    âœĒ Pulse (āĻĒāĻžāϞāϏ) – āĻĄāĻžāϞ
    âœĒ Cheese (āϚāĻŋāϜ) – āĻĒāύāĻŋāϰ
    âœĒ Beaten paddy (āĻŦāĻŋāĻŸā§‡āύ āĻĒā§āϝāĻžāĻĄāĻŋ) – āϚāĻŋāρ⧜āĻž
    âœĒ Hotchpotch (āĻšāϚāĻĒāϚ) – āĻ–āĻŋāϚ⧁āϰāĻŋ
    âœĒ Raw sugar (āϰ-āϏ⧁āĻ—āĻžāϰ) – āĻ—ā§ā§œ
    âœĒ Pop-corn (āĻĒāĻĒāĻ•āĻ°ā§āĻŖ) – āĻ–ā§ˆ
    âœĒ Puffed-rice (āĻĒāĻžāĻĢāĻĄ-āϰāĻžāχāϏ) – āĻŽā§ā§œāĻŋ
    âœĒ Ice cream (āφāχāϏ āĻ•ā§āϰāĻŋāĻŽ) – āϕ⧁āϞāĻĢāĻŋ
    âœĒ Cake (āϕ⧇āĻ•) – āĻĒāĻŋāĻ āĻž
    âœĒ Loaf (āϞ⧋āĻĢ) – āĻĒāĻžāĻ“āϰ⧁āϟāĻŋ
    âœĒ Honey (āĻšāĻžāύāĻŋ) – āĻŽāϧ⧁
    âœĒ Jam (āĻœā§āϝāĻžāĻŽ) – āĻŽā§‹āϰāĻŦā§āĻŦāĻž
    âœĒ Flour (āĻĢā§āϞāĻžāĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāϰ) – āφāϟāĻž
    âœĒ Sauce (āϏāϏ) – āφāϚāĻžāϰ
    âœĒ Tea (āϟāĻŋ) – āϚāĻž

    āϖ⧁āĻŦ āϏāĻšāĻœā§‡ āχāĻ‚āϰ⧇āϜāĻŋ āĻļ⧇āĻ–āĻžāϰ āĻŸā§‡āĻ•āύāĻŋāĻ• 👌 â™ĒSkillful : (āĻ¸ā§āĻ•āĻŋāϞāĻĢ⧁āϞ) āĻĻāĻ•ā§āώāĨ¤ â™ĒāϏ⧇ āĻāĻ•āϜāύ āĻĻāĻ•ā§āώ āĻĢ⧁āϟāĻŦāϞ āϖ⧇āĻ˛ā§‹ā§ŸāĻžā§œāĨ¤ â™ĒHe is a skillful football player. â™ĒApart : (āĻā§āϝāĻžāĻĒāĻžāĻ°ā§āϟ) āĻĻā§‚āϰ⧇, āĻĻā§‚āϰāĻ¤ā§āĻŦ⧇āĨ¤ â™ĒāĻ—ā§āϰāĻžāĻŽāϟāĻŋ āϤāĻŋāύ āĻŽāĻžāχāϞ āĻĻā§‚āϰ⧇āĨ¤ â™ĒThe village is three miles apart. â™ĒāĻĻā§āϝāĻž āĻ­āĻŋāϞ⧇āĻœā§ āχāϜ āĻĨā§āϰāĻŋ āĻŽāĻžāχāϞāĻ¸ā§ āĻā§āϝāĻžāĻĒāĻžāĻ°ā§āϟāĨ¤ â™ĒGive up : (āĻ—āĻŋāĻ­ āφāĻĒ) āĻ›ā§‡ā§œā§‡ āĻĻā§‡ā§ŸāĻž, āĻ¤ā§āϝāĻžāĻ— āĻ•āϰāĻžāĨ¤ â™ĒāĻ•āĻ–āύ⧋ āφāĻļāĻž āĻ›ā§‡ā§œā§‹ āύāĻžāĨ¤ â™ĒNever give up hope. â™Ēāύ⧇āĻ­āĻžāĻ°ā§ āĻ—āĻŋāĻ­ā§ āφāĻĒā§ āĻšā§‹āĻĒāĨ¤ â™ĒTerrible : (āĻŸā§‡āϰāĻŋāĻŦāϞ) āϭ⧟āĻžāĻŦāĻšāĨ¤ â™ĒāĻāϟāĻŋ āĻ›āĻŋāϞ āĻāĻ• āĻ­āϝāĻŧāĻžāĻŦāĻš āϏāĻĄāĻŧāĻ• āĻĻ⧁āĻ°ā§āϘāϟāύāĻžāĨ¤ â™ĒIt was a terrible road accident. â™Ēāχāϟ āĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāĻœā§ āĻā§āϝāĻž āĻŸā§‡āϰāĻŋāĻŦāϞ āϰ⧋āĻĄ āĻāĻ•ā§āϏāĻŋāĻĄā§‡āĻ¨ā§āϟāĨ¤ â™ĒServe : (āϏāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻ­) āϏ⧇āĻŦāĻž āĻ•āϰāĻžāĨ¤ â™ĒāφāĻŽāĻŋ āϰ⧋āĻ—ā§€āĻĻ⧇āϰ āϏ⧇āĻŦāĻž āĻ•āϰāϤ⧇ āĻ­āĻžāϞāĻŦāĻžāϏāĻŋ â™ĒI love to serve patients. â™Ēāφāχ āϞāĻžāĻ­ āϟ⧁ āϏāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻ­ āĻĒā§āϝāĻžāĻļ⧇āĻ¨ā§āϟāϏāĨ¤ â™ĒRequired: (āϰāĻŋāĻ•ā§Ÿā§āϝāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĄ) āφāĻŦāĻļā§āϝāĻ•, āĻĻāϰāĻ•āĻžāϰ⧀, āĻĒā§āĻ°ā§Ÿā§‹āϜāύāĨ¤ â™ĒāĻāχ āĻ•āĻžāĻœā§‡āϰ āϜāĻ¨ā§āϝ āĻĻ⧁āχ āϞāĻžāĻ– āϟāĻžāĻ•āĻž āĻĒā§āĻ°ā§Ÿā§‹āϜāύāĨ¤ â™ĒTwo lakh taka is required for this work. â™Ēāϟ⧁ āϞāĻžāĻ– āϟāĻžāĻ•āĻž āχāĻœā§ āϰāĻŋāĻ•ā§Ÿā§āϝāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĄ āĻĢāϰ āĻĻāĻŋāϏ āĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻ•āĨ¤ â™ĒSolution : (āϏāϞ⧁āĻļāύ)āϏāĻŽāĻžāϧāĻžāύāĨ¤ â™ĒāĻĒā§āϰāϤāĻŋāϟāĻŋ āϏāĻŽāĻ¸ā§āϝāĻžāϰ āχ āϏāĻŽāĻžāϧāĻžāύ āĻĨāĻžāϕ⧇āĨ¤ â™ĒEvery problem has its solution. â™ĒāĻāĻ­āϰāĻŋ āĻĒā§āϰāĻŦā§āϞ⧇āĻŽ āĻšā§āϝāĻžāϜ āχāϟāϜ āϏāϞ⧁āĻļāύāĨ¤ â™ĒIn the beginning : ( āχāύ āĻĻā§āϝāĻž āĻŦāĻŋāĻ—āĻŋāύāĻŋāĻ‚) āĻĒā§āϰāĻĨāĻŽā§‡, āĻļ⧁āϰ⧁āϤ⧇āĨ¤ â™ĒāĻļ⧁āϰ⧁āϤ⧇, āφāĻŽāĻŋ āφāĻĒāύāĻžāϕ⧇ āĻāχ āϜāĻŋāύāĻŋāϏāϟāĻŋ āĻŦāϞāϤ⧇ āϚāĻžāχāĨ¤ â™ĒIn the beginning, I would like to tell you this thing. â™Ēāχāύ āĻĻā§āϝāĻž āĻŦāĻŋāĻ—āĻŋāύāĻŋāĻ‚, āφāχ āωāĻĄ āϞāĻžāχāĻ• āϟ⧁ āĻŸā§‡āϞ āĻĻāĻŋāϏ āĻĨāĻŋāĻ‚ â™ĒIn the end : (āχāύ āĻĻā§āϝāĻž āĻāĻ¨ā§āĻĄ) āĻ…āĻŦāĻļ⧇āώ⧇, āĻĒāϰāĻŋāĻļ⧇āώ⧇āĨ¤ â™ĒāĻĒāϰāĻŋāĻļ⧇āώ⧇, āφāĻŽāĻŋ āφāĻĒāύāĻžāϕ⧇ āϏāĻŽāĻ¸ā§āϤ āĻ•āĻŋāϛ⧁āϰ āϜāĻ¨ā§āϝ āϧāĻ¨ā§āϝāĻŦāĻžāĻĻ āϜāĻžāύāĻžāϤ⧇ āϚāĻžāχāĨ¤ â™ĒIn the end, I would like to thank you for everything. â™Ēāχāύ āĻĻā§āϝāĻž āĻāĻ¨ā§āĻĄ, āφāχ āωāĻĄ āϞāĻžāχāĻ• āϟ⧁ āĻĨā§āϝāĻžāĻ‚āĻ• āχāω āĻĢāϰ āĻāĻ­āϰāĻŋāĻĨāĻŋāĻ‚āĨ¤ â™ĒSort out : (āϏāĻ°ā§āϟ āφāωāϟ) āϏāĻŽāĻžāϧāĻžāύ āĻ•āϰāĻžāĨ¤ â™ĒāφāĻŽāĻžāϰ āĻāĻ–āύāχ āĻāχ āϏāĻŽāĻ¸ā§āϝāĻžāϟāĻŋ āϏāĻŽāĻžāϧāĻžāύ āĻ•āϰāĻž āĻĻāϰāĻ•āĻžāϰāĨ¤ â™ĒI need to sort out this problem right now. â™Ēāφāχ āύāĻŋāĻĄ āϟ⧁ āϏāĻ°ā§āϟ āφāωāϟ āĻĻāĻŋāϏ āĻĒā§āϰāĻŦā§āϞ⧇āĻŽ āϰāĻžāχāϟ āύāĻžāωāĨ¤ â™ĒAt once : (āĻā§āϝāĻžāĻŸā§ āĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāĻ¨ā§āϏ) āĻ…āĻŦāĻŋāϞāĻŽā§āĻŦ⧇, āϤāĻ¤ā§āĻ•ā§āώāĻŖāĻžā§ŽāĨ¤ â™ĒāφāĻĒāύāĻŋ āĻŦāϰāĻ‚ āϤāĻžāϕ⧇ āĻāĻ•ā§āώ⧁āύāĻŋ āĻ•āϞ āĻ•āϰ⧁āύāĨ¤ â™ĒYou would rather call him at once. â™Ēāχāω āωāĻĄ āϰ⧇āĻĻāĻžāϰ āĻ•āϞ āĻšāĻŋāĻŽ āĻā§āϝāĻžāĻŸā§ āĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāĻ¨ā§āϏāĨ¤ â™ĒGo on : (āĻ—ā§‹ āĻ…āύ) āϚāĻžāϞāĻŋā§Ÿā§‡ āϝāĻžāĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāĨ¤ â™ĒāφāĻĒāύāĻžāϰ āĻ­āĻžāϞ āĻ•āĻžāϜ āϚāĻžāϞāĻŋāϝāĻŧ⧇ āϝāĻžāύāĨ¤ â™ĒGo on your good work. â™ĒāĻ—ā§‹ āĻ…āύ āχāωāϰ āϗ⧁āĻĄ āĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻ•āĨ¤ â™ĒDue to : (āĻĄāĻŋāω āϟ⧁) āĻ•āĻžāϰāϪ⧇āĨ¤ â™ĒāĻāϟāĻž āϤāĻžāϰ āĻ…āĻĒ⧇āĻļāĻžāĻĻāĻžāϰāĻŋāϤāĻžāϰ āĻ•āĻžāϰāϪ⧇ āϘāĻŸā§‡āĻ›āĻŋāϞāĨ¤ â™ĒIt happened due to his unprofessionalism. â™ĒHuge : (āĻšāĻŋāωāϜ) āĻ…āύ⧇āĻ• āĻŦ⧜, āϚāϰāĻŽāĨ¤ â™ĒāϐāϟāĻž āĻāĻ•āϟāĻž āϚāϰāĻŽ āϏāĻžāĻĢāĻ˛ā§āϝ āĻ›āĻŋāϞ⧋. â™ĒIt was a huge success. â™Ēāχāϟ āĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāϜ āĻā§āϝāĻž āĻšāĻŋāωāϜ āϏāĻžāĻ•āϏ⧇āϏāĨ¤ â™ĒKeen on :(āĻ•āĻŋāύ āĻ…āύ) āφāĻ—ā§āϰāĻšā§€āĨ¤ â™ĒāϤāĻŋāύāĻŋ āĻ—āĻžāύ⧇āϰ āĻĒā§āϰāϤāĻŋ āφāĻ—ā§āϰāĻšā§€āĨ¤ â™ĒShe is keen on music. â™ĒāĻļā§€ āχāĻœā§ āϕ⧀āύ āĻ…āύ āĻŽāĻŋāωāϜāĻŋāĻ•āĨ¤ â™ĒFond of : (āĻĢāĻ¨ā§āĻĄ āĻ…āĻĢ) āĻĒāĻ›āĻ¨ā§āĻĻ āĻ•āϰāĻž, āωāĻĒāĻ­ā§‹āĻ— āĻ•āϰāĻžāĨ¤ â™ĒāφāĻŽāĻŋ āχāĻ‚āϰ⧇āϜāĻŋāϤ⧇ āĻ•āĻĨāĻž āĻŦāϞāϤ⧇ āĻĒāĻ›āĻ¨ā§āĻĻ āĻ•āϰāĻŋāĨ¤ â™ĒI am fond of speaking English. â™Ēāφāχ āĻā§āϝāĻžāĻŽā§ āĻĢāĻ¨ā§āĻĄ āĻ…āĻŦ āĻ¸ā§āĻĒāĻŋāĻ•āĻŋāĻ‚ āχāĻ‚āϞāĻŋāĻļāĨ¤ â™ĒEmphasize : (āĻāĻŽā§āĻĢ⧇āϏāĻžāχāϜ) āϗ⧁āϰ⧁āĻ¤ā§āĻŦ āφāϰ⧋āĻĒ āĻ•āϰāĻž, āĻœā§‹āϰ āĻĻ⧇āĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāĨ¤ â™ĒāφāĻĒāύāĻžāϰ āύāĻŋāĻœā§‡āϰ āĻ•āĻžāĻœā§‡āϰ āωāĻĒāϰ āĻœā§‹āϰ āĻĻāĻŋāύāĨ¤ â™ĒEmphasize your own work. â™ĒāĻāĻŽā§āĻĢ⧇āϏāĻžāχāϜ āχāωāϰ āĻ“āύ āĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻ•āĨ¤ â™ĒTalk it over : ( āϟāĻ•ā§ āχāϟ āĻ“āĻ­āĻžāϰ) āφāϞ⧋āϚāύāĻž āĻ•āϰāĻžāĨ¤ â™ĒāϚāϞ⧋ āĻāχ āĻŦāĻŋāĻˇā§Ÿā§‡ āĻ•āĻŋāϛ⧁āĻ•ā§āώāĻŖ āĻĒāϰ⧇ āφāϞ⧋āϚāύāĻž āĻ•āϰāĻŋāĨ¤ â™ĒLet's talk it over a bit later. â™ĒāϞ⧇āϟāĻ¸ā§ āϟāĻ• āχāϟ āĻ“āĻ­āĻžāϰ āĻā§āϝāĻž āĻŦāĻŋāϟ āϞ⧇āϟāĻžāϰāĨ¤ â™ĒLikely to : (āϞāĻžāχāĻ•āϞāĻŋ āϟ⧁) āϏāĻŽā§āĻ­āĻžāĻŦāύāĻž āφāϛ⧇āĨ¤ â™ĒāĻāϟāĻž āĻšāĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāϰ āϏāĻŽā§āĻ­āĻžāĻŦāύāĻž āφāϛ⧇āĨ¤ â™ĒIt's likely to happen. â™ĒāχāϟāϜ āϞāĻžāχāĻ•āϞāĻŋ āϟ⧁ āĻšā§āϝāĻžāĻĒ⧇āύāĨ¤ â™ĒUnlikely to : ( āφāύāϞāĻžāχāĻ•āϞāĻŋ āϟ⧁) āϏāĻŽā§āĻ­āĻžāĻŦāύāĻž āύ⧇āχāĨ¤ â™ĒāϤāĻžāϰ āφāĻžāϏāĻžāϰ āϏāĻŽā§āĻ­āĻžāĻŦāύāĻž āύ⧇āχāĨ¤ â™ĒShe is unlikely to come. â™ĒāĻļā§€ āχāĻœā§ āφāύāϞāĻžāχāĻ•āϞāĻŋ āϟ⧁ āĻ•āĻžāĻŽā§āĨ¤ â™ĒUndoubtedly : (āφāύāĻĄāĻžāωāĻŸā§‡āĻĄāϞāĻŋ) āύāĻŋāσāϏāĻ¨ā§āĻĻ⧇āĻšā§‡āĨ¤ āύāĻŋāĻļā§āϚāĻŋāϤāĻ­āĻžāĻŦ⧇āĨ¤ â™ĒāύāĻŋāσāϏāĻ¨ā§āĻĻ⧇āĻšā§‡ āĻ­āĻžāĻ—ā§āϝ āφāĻŽāĻžāĻĻ⧇āϰ āĻĒāĻžāĻļ⧇ āĻĨāĻžāĻ•āĻŦ⧇āĨ¤ â™ĒUndoubtedly luck will be on our side. â™ĒāφāύāĻĄāĻžāωāĻŸā§‡āĻĄāϞāĻŋ āϞāĻžāĻ• āωāχāϞ āĻŦāĻŋ āĻ…āύ āφāĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāϰ āϏāĻžāχāĻĄāĨ¤ â™ĒWake up : (āĻ“ā§Ÿā§‡āĻ• āφāĻĒ) āĻœā§‡āϗ⧇ āωāĻ āĻžāĨ¤ â™ĒāφāĻŽāĻŋ āϖ⧁āĻŦ āϏāĻ•āĻžāϞ⧇ āϘ⧁āĻŽ āĻĨ⧇āϕ⧇ āωāĻ āĻŋāĨ¤ â™ĒI wake up very early in the morning. āĻĒ⧜āĻž āĻļ⧇āώ⧇ Done āϞāĻŋāĻ–āϤ⧇ āϭ⧁āϞāĻŦ⧇āύ āύāĻžāĨ¤ ✅ âœĒ Beef (āĻŦāĻŋāĻĢ) – āĻ—āϰ⧁āϰ āĻŽāĻžāĻ‚āϏ âœĒ Pulse (āĻĒāĻžāϞāϏ) – āĻĄāĻžāϞ âœĒ Cheese (āϚāĻŋāϜ) – āĻĒāύāĻŋāϰ âœĒ Beaten paddy (āĻŦāĻŋāĻŸā§‡āύ āĻĒā§āϝāĻžāĻĄāĻŋ) – āϚāĻŋāρ⧜āĻž âœĒ Hotchpotch (āĻšāϚāĻĒāϚ) – āĻ–āĻŋāϚ⧁āϰāĻŋ âœĒ Raw sugar (āϰ-āϏ⧁āĻ—āĻžāϰ) – āĻ—ā§ā§œ âœĒ Pop-corn (āĻĒāĻĒāĻ•āĻ°ā§āĻŖ) – āĻ–ā§ˆ âœĒ Puffed-rice (āĻĒāĻžāĻĢāĻĄ-āϰāĻžāχāϏ) – āĻŽā§ā§œāĻŋ âœĒ Ice cream (āφāχāϏ āĻ•ā§āϰāĻŋāĻŽ) – āϕ⧁āϞāĻĢāĻŋ âœĒ Cake (āϕ⧇āĻ•) – āĻĒāĻŋāĻ āĻž âœĒ Loaf (āϞ⧋āĻĢ) – āĻĒāĻžāĻ“āϰ⧁āϟāĻŋ âœĒ Honey (āĻšāĻžāύāĻŋ) – āĻŽāϧ⧁ âœĒ Jam (āĻœā§āϝāĻžāĻŽ) – āĻŽā§‹āϰāĻŦā§āĻŦāĻž âœĒ Flour (āĻĢā§āϞāĻžāĻ“ā§ŸāĻžāϰ) – āφāϟāĻž âœĒ Sauce (āϏāϏ) – āφāϚāĻžāϰ âœĒ Tea (āϟāĻŋ) – āϚāĻž
    0 Comments 0 Shares 323 Views
  • Vegetables Name in English
    đŸĢ˜ Green Bean (āĻ—ā§āϰāĻŋāύ āĻŦāĻŋāύ) – āĻŦāϰāĻŦāϟāĻŋ
    đŸĢ˜ Lima Bean (āϞāĻžāχāĻŽāĻž āĻŦāĻŋāύ) – āϏāĻŋāĻŽ
    đŸĢ˜ String Bean (āĻ¸ā§āĻŸā§āϰāĻŋāĻ‚ āĻŦāĻŋāύ) – āĻāĻŋāĻ™ā§āϗ⧇
    Ridge Gourd (āϰāĻŋāϜ āĻ—āĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĄ) – āĻāĻŋāĻ™ā§āϗ⧇
    Bottle Gourd (āĻŦāϟāϞ āĻ—āĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĄ) – āϞāĻžāω
    Sponge Gourd (āĻ¸ā§āĻĒāĻžā§āϜ āĻ—āĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĄ) – āϧ⧁āĻ¨ā§āĻĻ⧁āϞ
    Snake Gourd (āĻ¸ā§āύ⧇āĻ• āĻ—āĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĄ) – āϚāĻŋāϚāĻŋāĻ™ā§āĻ—āĻž
    Ivy Gourd (āφāχāĻ­āĻŋ āĻ—āĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĄ) – āĻ•āĻžāĻ•āϰ⧋āϞ
    Pointed Gourd (āĻĒāϝāĻŧ⧇āĻ¨ā§āĻŸā§‡āĻĄ āĻ—āĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĄ) – āĻĒāϟāϞ
    Teasel Gourd (āϟāĻŋāĻœā§‡āϞ āĻ—āĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĄ) – āĻ•āĻžāρāĻ•āϰ⧋āϞ
    Ash Gourd (āĻ…ā§āϝāĻžāĻļ āĻ—āĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĄ) – āϚāĻžāϞ āϕ⧁āĻŽāĻĄāĻŧāĻž
    Pumpkin (āĻĒāĻžāĻŽā§āĻĒāĻ•āĻŋāύ) – āϕ⧁āĻŽāĻĄāĻŧāĻž
    Taro (āĻŸā§āϝāĻžāϰ⧋) – āĻ•āϚ⧁
    Colocasia (āĻ•āϞ⧋āϕ⧇āϏāĻŋāϝāĻŧāĻž) – āĻĻ⧁āϧ āĻ•āϚ⧁
    Okra (āĻ“āĻ•ā§āϰāĻž) – āĻĸ⧇āρ⧜āϏ
    Green Peas (āĻ—ā§āϰāĻŋāύ āĻĒāĻŋāϏ) – āĻŽāϟāϰāĻļ⧁āϟāĻŋ
    Zucchini (āϜ⧁āĻ•āĻŋāύāĻŋ) – āĻ¸ā§āϕ⧋āϝāĻŧāĻžāĻļ
    Turnip (āϟāĻžāϰāύāĻŋāĻĒ) – āĻļāĻžāϞāĻ—āĻŽ
    Radish (āϰ‍ā§āϝāĻžāĻĄāĻŋāĻļ) – āĻŽā§āϞāĻž
    Drumstick (āĻĄā§āϰāĻžāĻŽāĻ¸ā§āϟāĻŋāĻ•) – āϏāϜāύ⧇ āĻĄāĻžāϟāĻž
    Curry Leaf (āĻ•āĻžāϰāĻŋ āϞāĻŋāĻĢ) – āĻ•āĻžāϰāĻŋāĻĒāĻžāϤāĻž
    Spring Onion (āĻ¸ā§āĻĒā§āϰāĻŋāĻ‚ āĻ…āύāĻŋāϝāĻŧāύ) – āĻ•āĻžāρāϚāĻž āĻĒ⧇āρāϝāĻŧāĻžāϜ
    Leek (āϞāĻŋāĻ•) – āϞāĻŋāĻ• āϏāĻŦāϜāĻŋ
    Chives (āϚāĻžāχāĻ­āϏ) – āĻĒ⧇āρ⧟āĻžāϜ āĻĒāĻžāϤāĻž
    Celery (āϏ⧇āϞāĻžāϰāĻŋ) – āϏ⧇āϞāĻžāϰāĻŋ āĻĒāĻžāϤāĻž
    Chili (āϚāĻŋāϞāĻŋ) – āĻŽāϰāĻŋāϚ
    Garlic (āĻ—āĻžāĻ°ā§āϞāĻŋāĻ•) – āϰāϏ⧁āύ
    Onion (āĻ…āύāĻŋāϝāĻŧāύ) – āĻĒ⧇āρāϝāĻŧāĻžāϜ
    Salt (āϏāĻ˛ā§āϟ) – āϞāĻŦāĻŖ
    Sugar (āĻļ⧁āĻ—āĻžāϰ) – āϚāĻŋāύāĻŋ
    Turmeric (āϟāĻžāϰāĻŽāĻžāϰāĻŋāĻ•) – āĻšāϞ⧁āĻĻ
    Cumin (āĻ•āĻŋāωāĻŽāĻŋāύ) – āϜāĻŋāϰāĻž
    Coriander (āϕ⧋āϰāĻŋ⧟āĻžāĻ¨ā§āĻĄāĻžāϰ) – āϧāύ⧇
    Black Pepper (āĻŦā§āĻ˛ā§āϝāĻžāĻ• āĻĒ⧇āĻĒāĻžāϰ) – āĻ—ā§‹āϞāĻŽāϰāĻŋāϚ
    Ginger (āϜāĻŋāĻžā§āϜāĻžāϰ) – āφāĻĻāĻž
    Bay Leaf (āĻŦ⧇ āϞāĻŋāĻĢ) – āϤ⧇āϜāĻĒāĻžāϤāĻž
    Nutmeg (āύāĻžāϟāĻŽā§‡āĻ—) – āϜāĻžā§ŸāĻĢāϞ
    Mace (āĻŽā§‡āχāϏ) – āϜāϝāĻŧāĻ¤ā§āϰ⧀
    Mint Leaf (āĻŽāĻŋāĻ¨ā§āϟ āϞāĻŋāĻĢ) – āĻĒ⧁āĻĻāĻŋāύāĻž āĻĒāĻžāϤāĻž
    Basil (āĻŦā§āϝāĻžāϏāĻŋāϞ) – āϤ⧁āϞāϏāĻŋ āĻĒāĻžāϤāĻž
    Clove (āĻ•ā§āϞ⧋āĻ­) – āϞāĻŦāĻ™ā§āĻ—
    Cardamom (āĻ•āĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĄāĻžāĻŽāĻŽ) – āĻāϞāĻžāϚ
    Cinnamon (āϏāĻŋāύāĻžāĻŽāύ) – āĻĻāĻžāϰ⧁āϚāĻŋāύāĻŋ
    Lemon (āϞ⧇āĻŽāύ) – āϞ⧇āĻŦ⧁
    Green Chili (āĻ—ā§āϰ⧀āύ āϚāĻŋāϞāĻŋ) – āĻ•āĻžāρāϚāĻž āĻŽāϰāĻŋāϚ
    Tomato (Dry) (āϟāĻŽā§‡āĻŸā§‹ āĻĄā§āϰāĻžāχ) – āĻļ⧁āĻ•āύāĻž āϟāĻŽā§‡āĻŸā§‹
    Dry Coconut (āĻĄā§āϰāĻžāχ āϕ⧋āϕ⧇āĻžāύāĻžāϟ) – āύāĻžāϰāϕ⧇āϞ āĻ•ā§‹ā§œāĻž
    Vinegar (āĻ­āĻŋāύāĻŋāĻ—āĻžāϰ) – āĻ­āĻŋāύ⧇āĻ—āĻžāϰ / āϏāĻŋāϰāĻ•āĻž
    Mustard (āĻŽāĻžāĻ¸ā§āϟāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĄ) – āϏāϰāĻŋāώāĻž
    Mustard Oil (āĻŽāĻžāĻ¸ā§āϟāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĄ āĻ…ā§Ÿā§‡āϞ) – āϏāϰāĻŋāώāĻžāϰ āϤ⧇āϞ
    Soy Sauce (āϏ⧟ āϏāϏ) – āϏāϝāĻŧāĻž āϏāϏ
    Ghee (āϘāĻŋ) – āϘāĻŋ
    Butter (āĻŦāĻžāϟāĻžāϰ) – āĻŽāĻžāĻ–āύ
    Asafoetida (āĻ…ā§āϝāĻžāϏāĻžāĻĢ⧇āϟāĻŋāĻĄāĻž) – āĻšāĻŋāĻ‚
    Vegetables Name in English đŸĢ˜ Green Bean (āĻ—ā§āϰāĻŋāύ āĻŦāĻŋāύ) – āĻŦāϰāĻŦāϟāĻŋ đŸĢ˜ Lima Bean (āϞāĻžāχāĻŽāĻž āĻŦāĻŋāύ) – āϏāĻŋāĻŽ đŸĢ˜ String Bean (āĻ¸ā§āĻŸā§āϰāĻŋāĻ‚ āĻŦāĻŋāύ) – āĻāĻŋāĻ™ā§āϗ⧇ đŸĨ’ Ridge Gourd (āϰāĻŋāϜ āĻ—āĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĄ) – āĻāĻŋāĻ™ā§āϗ⧇ đŸĨ’ Bottle Gourd (āĻŦāϟāϞ āĻ—āĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĄ) – āϞāĻžāω đŸĨ’ Sponge Gourd (āĻ¸ā§āĻĒāĻžā§āϜ āĻ—āĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĄ) – āϧ⧁āĻ¨ā§āĻĻ⧁āϞ đŸĨ’ Snake Gourd (āĻ¸ā§āύ⧇āĻ• āĻ—āĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĄ) – āϚāĻŋāϚāĻŋāĻ™ā§āĻ—āĻž 🍆 Ivy Gourd (āφāχāĻ­āĻŋ āĻ—āĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĄ) – āĻ•āĻžāĻ•āϰ⧋āϞ đŸĨ’ Pointed Gourd (āĻĒāϝāĻŧ⧇āĻ¨ā§āĻŸā§‡āĻĄ āĻ—āĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĄ) – āĻĒāϟāϞ đŸĨ’ Teasel Gourd (āϟāĻŋāĻœā§‡āϞ āĻ—āĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĄ) – āĻ•āĻžāρāĻ•āϰ⧋āϞ đŸĨ’ Ash Gourd (āĻ…ā§āϝāĻžāĻļ āĻ—āĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĄ) – āϚāĻžāϞ āϕ⧁āĻŽāĻĄāĻŧāĻž đŸĨ’ Pumpkin (āĻĒāĻžāĻŽā§āĻĒāĻ•āĻŋāύ) – āϕ⧁āĻŽāĻĄāĻŧāĻž 🍠 Taro (āĻŸā§āϝāĻžāϰ⧋) – āĻ•āϚ⧁ 🍠 Colocasia (āĻ•āϞ⧋āϕ⧇āϏāĻŋāϝāĻŧāĻž) – āĻĻ⧁āϧ āĻ•āϚ⧁ 🌱 Okra (āĻ“āĻ•ā§āϰāĻž) – āĻĸ⧇āρ⧜āϏ 🌱 Green Peas (āĻ—ā§āϰāĻŋāύ āĻĒāĻŋāϏ) – āĻŽāϟāϰāĻļ⧁āϟāĻŋ đŸĨ’ Zucchini (āϜ⧁āĻ•āĻŋāύāĻŋ) – āĻ¸ā§āϕ⧋āϝāĻŧāĻžāĻļ đŸĨ’ Turnip (āϟāĻžāϰāύāĻŋāĻĒ) – āĻļāĻžāϞāĻ—āĻŽ đŸĨ’ Radish (āϰ‍ā§āϝāĻžāĻĄāĻŋāĻļ) – āĻŽā§āϞāĻž đŸŒŋ Drumstick (āĻĄā§āϰāĻžāĻŽāĻ¸ā§āϟāĻŋāĻ•) – āϏāϜāύ⧇ āĻĄāĻžāϟāĻž đŸŒŋ Curry Leaf (āĻ•āĻžāϰāĻŋ āϞāĻŋāĻĢ) – āĻ•āĻžāϰāĻŋāĻĒāĻžāϤāĻž đŸŒŋ Spring Onion (āĻ¸ā§āĻĒā§āϰāĻŋāĻ‚ āĻ…āύāĻŋāϝāĻŧāύ) – āĻ•āĻžāρāϚāĻž āĻĒ⧇āρāϝāĻŧāĻžāϜ đŸŒŋ Leek (āϞāĻŋāĻ•) – āϞāĻŋāĻ• āϏāĻŦāϜāĻŋ đŸŒŋ Chives (āϚāĻžāχāĻ­āϏ) – āĻĒ⧇āρ⧟āĻžāϜ āĻĒāĻžāϤāĻž đŸŒŋ Celery (āϏ⧇āϞāĻžāϰāĻŋ) – āϏ⧇āϞāĻžāϰāĻŋ āĻĒāĻžāϤāĻž đŸŒļī¸ Chili (āϚāĻŋāϞāĻŋ) – āĻŽāϰāĻŋāϚ 🧄 Garlic (āĻ—āĻžāĻ°ā§āϞāĻŋāĻ•) – āϰāϏ⧁āύ 🧅 Onion (āĻ…āύāĻŋāϝāĻŧāύ) – āĻĒ⧇āρāϝāĻŧāĻžāϜ 🧂 Salt (āϏāĻ˛ā§āϟ) – āϞāĻŦāĻŖ đŸĨ„ Sugar (āĻļ⧁āĻ—āĻžāϰ) – āϚāĻŋāύāĻŋ 🟠 Turmeric (āϟāĻžāϰāĻŽāĻžāϰāĻŋāĻ•) – āĻšāϞ⧁āĻĻ đŸ¤Ž Cumin (āĻ•āĻŋāωāĻŽāĻŋāύ) – āϜāĻŋāϰāĻž 🟤 Coriander (āϕ⧋āϰāĻŋ⧟āĻžāĻ¨ā§āĻĄāĻžāϰ) – āϧāύ⧇ âšĢ Black Pepper (āĻŦā§āĻ˛ā§āϝāĻžāĻ• āĻĒ⧇āĻĒāĻžāϰ) – āĻ—ā§‹āϞāĻŽāϰāĻŋāϚ 🧡 Ginger (āϜāĻŋāĻžā§āϜāĻžāϰ) – āφāĻĻāĻž 🍂 Bay Leaf (āĻŦ⧇ āϞāĻŋāĻĢ) – āϤ⧇āϜāĻĒāĻžāϤāĻž 🌰 Nutmeg (āύāĻžāϟāĻŽā§‡āĻ—) – āϜāĻžā§ŸāĻĢāϞ 🌰 Mace (āĻŽā§‡āχāϏ) – āϜāϝāĻŧāĻ¤ā§āϰ⧀ 🍃 Mint Leaf (āĻŽāĻŋāĻ¨ā§āϟ āϞāĻŋāĻĢ) – āĻĒ⧁āĻĻāĻŋāύāĻž āĻĒāĻžāϤāĻž đŸŒŋ Basil (āĻŦā§āϝāĻžāϏāĻŋāϞ) – āϤ⧁āϞāϏāĻŋ āĻĒāĻžāϤāĻž 🟤 Clove (āĻ•ā§āϞ⧋āĻ­) – āϞāĻŦāĻ™ā§āĻ— 🟤 Cardamom (āĻ•āĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĄāĻžāĻŽāĻŽ) – āĻāϞāĻžāϚ 🟤 Cinnamon (āϏāĻŋāύāĻžāĻŽāύ) – āĻĻāĻžāϰ⧁āϚāĻŋāύāĻŋ 🍋 Lemon (āϞ⧇āĻŽāύ) – āϞ⧇āĻŦ⧁ đŸŸĸ Green Chili (āĻ—ā§āϰ⧀āύ āϚāĻŋāϞāĻŋ) – āĻ•āĻžāρāϚāĻž āĻŽāϰāĻŋāϚ 🍅 Tomato (Dry) (āϟāĻŽā§‡āĻŸā§‹ āĻĄā§āϰāĻžāχ) – āĻļ⧁āĻ•āύāĻž āϟāĻŽā§‡āĻŸā§‹ đŸĨĨ Dry Coconut (āĻĄā§āϰāĻžāχ āϕ⧋āϕ⧇āĻžāύāĻžāϟ) – āύāĻžāϰāϕ⧇āϞ āĻ•ā§‹ā§œāĻž 💧 Vinegar (āĻ­āĻŋāύāĻŋāĻ—āĻžāϰ) – āĻ­āĻŋāύ⧇āĻ—āĻžāϰ / āϏāĻŋāϰāĻ•āĻž 🟠 Mustard (āĻŽāĻžāĻ¸ā§āϟāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĄ) – āϏāϰāĻŋāώāĻž 🧴 Mustard Oil (āĻŽāĻžāĻ¸ā§āϟāĻžāĻ°ā§āĻĄ āĻ…ā§Ÿā§‡āϞ) – āϏāϰāĻŋāώāĻžāϰ āϤ⧇āϞ 🧴 Soy Sauce (āϏ⧟ āϏāϏ) – āϏāϝāĻŧāĻž āϏāϏ đŸļ Ghee (āϘāĻŋ) – āϘāĻŋ 🧈 Butter (āĻŦāĻžāϟāĻžāϰ) – āĻŽāĻžāĻ–āύ đŸ§Ē Asafoetida (āĻ…ā§āϝāĻžāϏāĻžāĻĢ⧇āϟāĻŋāĻĄāĻž) – āĻšāĻŋāĻ‚
    0 Comments 0 Shares 213 Views
More Results
BlackBird Ai
https://bbai.shop